Notice how in video below how steep terrain forces runners to put hands-on ground. The steepness of the hill forced the runners to balance themselves Without doing the balancing thing would have led to an injury. The running Bigfoot runs to the top and keeps running. If critics can find another video runner doing the same thing I will be impressed. Then I would see them as justified in saying it's a hoax. I looked for the closest example I could find. I think this video I will share below justifies my belief in the original in Discovering Bigfoot. After seeing the video posted by Amanda Joseph, I have another question for you. Todd Standing showed off the steep hill at the site. Which hill is steeper the one he showed off or the one at the video of the event? ThinkerThunker I think used vide of the same event in one of the links I shared. He has offered one of the best analysis of Todds videos I have watched.

Michael Moss from the fictional Sylvanic is the supposed running Sasquatch. He was rumored to be the guy in Discovering Bigfoot. Todd I guess his critics into the rumor feel he used video of Michael running uphill in costume. That the rumor is I guess is Todd used footage of Moss from his own film. I was told the guy would never tell on Todd because he was under a non-disclosure agreement. I doubt he was afraid of Todd suing him because he was not the running bigfoot. The ThinkerThunker 21 Degrees Between Bigfoot might authenticate the animal. If it lifts it leg at an angle in a non- human way its authentic. I posted a link to the TT video in a new post. His detail he noticed might be a new think to look for. Perhaps the detail on the Sasquatch leg movement prevents injury. Bigfoots face obstacles like logs and steep terrain. https://youtu.be/IC2c7QQXz5Q

Try running up a steep hill at a 45 degree angle. I doubt any human will get very far. A fall at that steep angle would pose a danger to the person. I know Bigfoot Tony has argued against the authenticity of Todds videos of sasquatch. He feels the Bigfoot running up the hill is a normally sized human. I have read a response from the Mountain Beast Mysteries YouTube channel. He suggested to me it's a particular Alberta fire fighter. I like the guy and his channel and do not doubt his sincerity. Todd he said had once done a fictional bigfoot movie. That the guy was an actor under a non-disclosure agreement. And that Todd would sue him if he talked. I think Michael Moss was the one he thought was built like a bigfoot. And that he was the supposed running up the hill bigfoot. The videos of Michael running in costume was supposedly used in Discovering Bigfoot. Thinker Thunker showed in a video clip showed athletes had a problem with a 45 degree angle. Walking slowly without employing safety balancing tricks is impossible. The other video from TT eliminates Michael Moss from running up the hill. Michael unless wearing stilts could not safely move unless on a flat surface. And the running up the hill Sasquatch has an easy time running up hill. At the time I investigated Todds videos I became aware of this rumor. I trust the video of the running sasquatch as authentic. I know it looks like a fake video. Yet as Cryptid Seeker and ThinkerThunker shows the video has features that cannot easily be hoaxed. TT to not overstate himself thought it might be possible for a human to do the run. I know a human could not do the run as its impossible with or without costume. https: //www.imdb.com/title/tt1728675/

I could not get the link working. So, when I tried last my comments got deleted and the link worked. I needed space for my comment. I hate to edit the above and not have the link wok. 1. Anyway ideally, I would like to see Todds creatures walk. The degree real Bigfoots pick up the legs is different than a human. Todd lost his originals in a home robbery. I think my memory is right. All we have now is brief vdeos. 2. I wish Todd could go the spots he filmed them. Demonstrating he filmed tall animals would help eliminate humans in costumes. The Sasquatch running up the hill is not CGI so it must be human or a 7-12 foot Sasquatch or a human. Cryptid Seeker did do a good job arguing for it being a tall Sasquatch. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCCksauCESxVr1zMC9jgdgmw

Watch this movie about about Adirondack mountain encounter with Bigfoot. https://youtu.be/z6LClQQkqhA

It is unfortunate. But even so what we have is useful. I would like to take my Amazon Fire TV Cube and hook it up to a 50 inch TV. Of course on the TV I would like the ability to play with the brightness via a remote. Maybe something with all his videos could then be seen that will lend credibility to it being alive. I would be looking for tiny skin or eye movements.

This video shows the detail of the eye I cannot see on my TV. The eye looks very real to me. Cryptid Seeker raises a huge problem for seeing this as a human in a mask. The extra space in between the eyes would make the mask to big for a human head A human head in a mask would wear a smaller head that fits normal human eye spacing. https://youtu.be/xVe3kiXfrGo

Amanda what I suspect a human in a costume would need to use his hands and legs to balance. A few years ago some High School kids witnessed and got on video a bigfoot with an arm swing. They were along with Dr. Meldrum appeared in a Finding Bigfoot episode. The way they use their arms is interesting.

Cryptid Seeker on his YouTube channel does a good job at establishing the animal is tall. I think he suggested 9-10 feet. I cannot see a human being that tall unless he had stilts on. I am not sure whether the arm length of the creature is short like a human, or abnormally long like a bigfoot arm. Arm extensions would have to be used if it were an actor in a costume. I cannot imagine a human running up a steep hill with lots of special effects gear on. Due to my MS I cannot hike anymore. But I have hiked up a steep hill and I have had to balance myself while going up. And I was only wearing normal clothing. I was worried about losing my balance and hurting myself. The creature has no concern about its safety at all.

The size of the arms looks long to me. The Bigfoot seen also seems quite large. I wish measurements of the spot it crouched could be taken. Was it too big to be a human in a costume? What size of a person would be needed to fill that size of costume? It seems real not like a costume. It seems like Patty in the PGF film. if video of it moving along like Patty could have been taken it would help. The moving of muscles in the film show Patty is not a human in a costume. In a hoax, arm extensions would have to be used. I have not studied the matter but I assume on video fake long arms would look funny. The functioning looks normal to me. The location where it was filmed looks very hard to reach. Then I would have to imagine a friend of Todd's dressing up. No doubt exists in my mind that Todd filmed the animal. The scene is so well done more than two people would be needed to hoax it.

I am not done studying the animals. Cryptid Seeker at that YouTube channel is doing the type of work that's needed. Do manufactured eye balls look like those in the video? The eyes look wet to me.

The darkened face at the end of the film blinkiths. I had to brighten up my TV to see that. Masks do not blink. ThinkerThunker on his YouTube Channel and Roku Channel gives a good reason to think the Sasquatch running up the hill might be real. The hill was quite steep, but it had no problem with gravity. A human pretending to be a Sasquatch should have difficulty. Bigfoot Tony on his YouTube Channel also did an analysis. Watching the film on my Roku/Amazon Fire TV was an experience. I noticed things with a larger screen and setting tricks i would not have noticed. The eyes of one of the creatures looks like it reflects light. I also saw a bit of eye color. Were it not for such details i would just see a human in a mask. If i had better and closer videos i would look for other eye blinks, skin movements. Yet Todd got some good videos to study anyway. Unless Todd is fooling persons on his expeditions persons experience Sasquatch with him. His YouTube Sylvanic Bigfoot chanel has such testimonials. Obviously something tall would not be a friend of Todd's in a costume. I know he points out track evidence to Dr. Bindernagel and Dr. Meldrum. On Survivorman Bigfoot these hoaxers used stilts and feet made from casts made from Bigfoot track casts. Tracks could be made on soft soil. Yet in the tracks in the film were found on tougher soil. To leave tracks all over as in the film my guess is it would need pretty heavy weights. Or the easier idea of what made the track impressions would be to blame a large primate.

I do not feel the legal route will ever work out for you. The legal system unless you have a bigfoot body will favor the establishment.

It is so obvious with the eyeblinking that it is an animal. Todd has made a massive mistake in not getting out an enlarged lightened up video to the public. Show the video on every TV News program. Instead he gives nothing to convince the public that he might not be a hoaxer. I have had as had others questions about the authenticity of his other videos. I decided to give them the benifit of the doubt because of that animal. If he goes to court without that he puts himself in a weakened position with Judges. Once he loses a major case there is no second chances. But if the Judge saw that creature on TV first there is a chance. As i said Todd is on trial because of his film, videos of bigfoot before the other evidence. Before Todd appeared in that Canada court case that Judge already decided Todd Standing was a hoaxer. And that he was wasting his court time to sell his films.

MK Davis compared the eyes with a picture of the eyes in a reputed Siberian Sasquatch. I wonder why some videos have eyelids covering the eyes like normal and why some barely cover the eyes. Still i decided in order to be fake eyes he would need a good supplier. Plus Todd would risk the maker of said fake eyes coming forward and saying they made the eyes that he used. I had to play with the color a bit to see more eye detailss Todd when filming is as a disadvantage as when he filmed them the animals were resting. They were not on the move so it was impossible to get filming of other parts of their bodies. The clear back view suggests a curve that is more non-human than just a human in a cheap costume. I think the one squatting down has a but crack. In my minds eye i imaging the creature squatting was either a human, .. a large Sasquatch. I decided he was likely large as like the other one in the dark he filmed. The objects like rocks near it look good size to me. Todd unfortuntely took no measurenments of of the rocks. The size gives an ability to guess better about how wide it was. The one standing in the dark he does jump up to how how high the animal was. I cannot see it move, but something in a shape and size of a bigfoot was there. And if a fake i think it would be wy to expensive for Tood to do a full size tall and wide bigfoot. Someone could have wore stilts. And if not a costume it would have to be done differently like a shape held from hooks above it. Regardless of the ways critics could think he faked them they cannot prove it. My challenge for his critics is to duplicate the methods they think he used. His costumes if that are more like the cheap suggested costumes alleged to have been used for the PGF film. The facial work is not that of an ameteur special effects mask maker.

There appears to be depth in the eyes of the animals. I have had to brighten up my TV to see the details of the eyes. I think i can detect features i would see in human eyes also. Some think Todd uses masks but as another pointed out masks do not go all the way to the face. Utah Sasquatch pointed out that one of the actors that played Batman wore dark eye shadow to hide the fact he was wearing a mask. The eyes of each creature and the other details made me doubt he used masks. If a mask it would have to fit over the entire thread. Todd Standing looks better the more written responses exist to such concerns. I suggest being friendly to his critics and not sounding threatened by interacting with their arguments. Todd has not hoaxed anything but people think he did. Even a few of the head shots do not all look as real to me. Yet due to the complexity of those head shots i decided they could be alive. Dr. Meldrum and the late Dr. Bindernagel are serious types of people. If they thought he was hoaxing evidence they would not have let Todd Standing film them. I never knew in person Dr. Bindernagel, but he looked like a nice guy.

One problem for taking pictures is bigfoots like to hide. Todd got head shots but could not get lower body pictures. The young ones are hidden away from anyone with a camera. Creatures that feel like prey will want to hide. If Todd has any lower body pictures he is keeping that to himself.

I am glad Bigfoot Tony offered an alternative set of ideas on the figure in the picture. I choose to believe in certain things after hearing the best of both sides. The figure in the picture cannot be authenticated as being real. Trusting it is more a matter of personal preference. All i interpreted Todd as saying is he thought it was legitimate. Todd had better arguments for its size.

That video needs to be brightened up and put on the website. I had to brighten up the video to see fleshy eyelid blink. Let the public see it. Quote Dr. Meldrum from the film where he says its a living animal. Todd tell the public its not CGI, or any other type of special effects trick. Convince some to pay attention to that animal and eventually by some experts. I thought it was a mask until I saw the eyeblinks. The experts needed will think mask as none of them will brighten up the image. It should have been brightned up before its face got in that film. I see that as a major missed opportunity to show that detail to the viewers

Yes. Dr. Meldrum was impressed enough to endorse it as a live animal. The suggestion it is a human in a mask quickly failed in my mind. And i am not aware of any computer trick that could have created the blinking eyelids. Only if someone could do something similar are they justified in calling it a mask. Masks do not have an animals blinking eyes. So if it is not a mask with computerized blinking eyes its a sasquatch.